新GRE寫作備考方法

　　引導(dǎo)語(yǔ)：下面小編來(lái)和大家分享一下關(guān)于新GRE寫作的備考方法，希望能夠幫助到您。

　　一、有關(guān)GRE寫作范文

　　范文是一定要看的，看什么。我建議，開(kāi)始的時(shí)候，不要糾結(jié)于某某單詞的某某用法，大不了你寫的時(shí)候不用就是了。要大略的看，看作者是怎么展開(kāi)題目，從哪幾個(gè)方面入手，各自怎么論證的。

　　很重要的一點(diǎn)是，不要迷信范文。沒(méi)有任何證據(jù)表明你看到的這篇范文出自一位邏輯學(xué)大師的手，即便確實(shí)如此，對(duì)于同一問(wèn)題有不同的見(jiàn)解這是再正常不過(guò)的事情。思路可以借鑒，但千萬(wàn)不要僵化。

　　與此本質(zhì)相同的另一個(gè)方法是，請(qǐng)別人改作文，就觀點(diǎn)改或就文字改，按個(gè)人情況取舍。

　　二、文章開(kāi)始點(diǎn)明中心句

　　在每一段開(kāi)始的第一行，最好能明確地表達(dá)你想說(shuō)什么，也就是中心句。

　　這做法雖然死板，但往往有奇效。特別是對(duì)自己邏輯推理不是很有信心的各位，說(shuō)清楚了，沒(méi)說(shuō)全面總比說(shuō)都沒(méi)說(shuō)清楚要好。

　　三、寫作這個(gè)東西其實(shí)是相通的

　　我們中的很大一部分在高考結(jié)束后恐怕很少再寫這么長(zhǎng)的，同時(shí)主題又相對(duì)深刻的文字。英文只是一個(gè)表達(dá)方式，而論證過(guò)程則和中文沒(méi)有任何區(qū)別。如 果實(shí)在覺(jué)得難以上手，不妨先試試寫一篇自己認(rèn)為很深刻的中文文章看看。在邏輯和思想方面，這樣的訓(xùn)練方式會(huì)有奇效，同時(shí)對(duì)于心理是一個(gè)不小的鼓舞。

　　四、專門練習(xí)句子

　　如果真的想兼顧文字，不如在練邏輯練累的時(shí)候(我知道很容易累，很枯燥)，專門拿出一點(diǎn)時(shí)間去寫一些句子，效果更好。

　　如果說(shuō)GRE作文模版的話，這樣就足夠了。模版這個(gè)東西，背太多沒(méi)好處，太容易局限思維，還有雷同的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。

　　五、培養(yǎng)找到錯(cuò)誤的能力

　　還要說(shuō)明一點(diǎn)，以上是針對(duì)整個(gè)AW而言。對(duì)于argument，特別需要注意的是培養(yǎng)找到錯(cuò)誤的能力。

　　具體方法是，閱讀一定量的題目。這樣的好處有二：

　　1.通過(guò)閱讀題目，只找錯(cuò)誤來(lái)訓(xùn)練。

　　2.沒(méi)有誰(shuí)能保證argument里面不會(huì)出現(xiàn)一個(gè)你不認(rèn)識(shí)的單詞，萬(wàn)一是個(gè)關(guān)鍵詞，那可就……

　　argument其實(shí)和issue也是相通的，鍛煉一者的同時(shí)另一者一定也會(huì)提高，所以不要糾結(jié)浪費(fèi)時(shí)間的問(wèn)題。

　　六、關(guān)于機(jī)經(jīng)

　　我的意見(jiàn)是，反正寫什么都是寫，不如按照機(jī)經(jīng)寫。當(dāng)然，如果能寫很多很多，那我的意見(jiàn)沒(méi)有什么參考價(jià)值。

　　延伸閱讀：GRE寫作Argument的7種邏輯錯(cuò)誤

　　1、結(jié)論無(wú)據(jù)(gratuitous assumption)

　　The author falsely depends on gratuitousassumption that.... However, no evidence is stated in the argument to supportthis assumption. In fact, this is not necessarily the case. For example, it ismore likely that.... Therefore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling outsuch possibility.

　　2、無(wú)因果聯(lián)系

　　The author commits a fallacy of causaloversimplification. The line of the reasoning is that because A occurred beforeB, the former event is responsible for the latter. (The author uses thepositive correlation between A and B to establish causality. However, the factthat A coincides with B does not necessarily prove that A caused B.) But thisis fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have beenconsidered and ruled out. For example, perhaps C is the cause of these eventsor perhaps B is caused by D.

　　3、樣本不足(Insufficient-sample)

　　The evidence the author provides isinsufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is logicallyunsounded to establish a general conclusion (The statistics from only a fewrecent years are not necessarily a good indicator of future trends), unless itcan be shown that A1 is representative of all A.

　　4、二者擇一(Either-Orchoice)

　　The author assumes that AA and BB aremutually exclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ground.However, the author provides no reason for imposing an either-or choice. Commonsense tells us that adjusting both AA and BB might produce better results.

　　5、錯(cuò)誤類比 (based on a false analogy ) <橫向>

　　The argument rests on the assumptionthat A is analogous to B in all respects. This assumption is weak, sincealthough there are points of comparison between A and B, there is muchdissimilarity as well. For example, A..., however, B.... Thus, it is likelymuch more difficult for B to do....

　　6、時(shí)地全等 all thingsare equal <縱向>

　　The author commits the fallacy of “all things are equal”. The fact thathappened two years ago is not a sound evidence to draw a conclusion that....The author assumes without justification that the background conditions haveremained the same at different times or at different locations. However, it isnot clear in this argument whether the current conditions at AA are the same asthey used to be two years ago. Thus it is impossible to conclude that....

　　7、可疑調(diào)查(survey isdoubtful)

　　The poll cited by the author is toovague to be informative. The claim does not indicate who conducted the poll,who responded, or when, where and how the poll was conducted. (Lacking informationabout the number of people surveyed and the number of respondents, it isimpossible to access the validity of the results. For example, if 200 personswere surveyed but only 2 responded, the conclusion that...would be highlysuspect. Because the argument offers no evidence that would rule out this kindof interpretations,) Until these questions are answered, the results of thesurvey are worthless as evidence for the conclusion.

【新GRE寫作備考方法】相關(guān)文章：

新GRE寫作滿分備考方法06-27

GRE寫作滿分備考方法07-06

GRE考試填空備考方法06-08

備考新GRE必看書(shū)籍07-30

新GRE閱讀方法介紹09-02

新GRE Issue寫作高分經(jīng)驗(yàn)01-22

新GRE閱讀主旨題方法06-15

新GRE閱讀訓(xùn)練方法06-19

運(yùn)用GRE寫作提綱的方法07-28